Clik here to view.
Re: Completeness of records
Posting to RDA-L On 06/08/2011 19:00, Brenndorfer, Thomas wrote: <snip>But it’s not true FRBR, and it doesn’t do translations well, and so it requires extra effort to answer patron queries about...
View ArticleClik here to view.
Re: Justification of added entries
Posting to RDA-L On 22/08/2011 17:29, Casey A Mullin wrote: <snip>As Karen Coyle has often pointed out, it’s extremely inefficient to input things twice, as data and text. RDA is actually an...
View ArticleClik here to view.
Re: Some comments on the Final Report of the FRBR Working Group on Aggregates
Posting to RDA0L On 06/01/2012 15:41, Brenndorfer, Thomas wrote: <snip>The entities exist whether they’re brought out in the cataloging as significant or not. In RDA, many such entities and their...
View ArticleClik here to view.
Considerations on Linked Data (Was: Showing birth and death dates)
Posting to RDA-L On 27/01/2012 22:47, Tillett, Barbara wrote: <snip>ISBD came out of the card catalog environment and was a tremendous tool when we were exchanging bibliographic records. We are...
View ArticleClik here to view.
Re: Considerations on Linked Data (Was: Showing birth and death dates)
On 1/28/2012 6:51 PM, Karen Coyle wrote: <snip>On 1/28/12 9:03 AM, James Weinheimer wrote: But concerning linked data: Accessing bits and pieces of bibliographic records in the cloud using URIs...
View ArticleClik here to view.
Cataloging Matters Podcast no. 14: Musings on the Linked Data Diagram
Cataloging Matters Podcast no. 14: Musings on the Linked Data Diagram http://www.archive.org/details/CatalogingMatters14MusingsOnTheLinkedDataDiagramTRANSCRIPT: Hello everyone. My name is Jim...
View ArticleClik here to view.
Re: RDA Implementation Date Set
Posting to Autocat On 14/03/2012 13:45, Brenndorfer, Thomas wrote: <snip>What would an entity-relationship model of the pre-existing concepts in bibliographic data look like?</snip> To...
View ArticleClik here to view.
Re: [ACAT] RDA Implementation Date Set
On 14/03/2012 17:35, Kevin M Randall wrote:<snip>All we have to do is put in URIs and link them up? But what do the URIs mean? What does the heading represent? Does the heading mean “Romeo and...
View ArticleClik here to view.
Re: [ACAT] New rule implementation
Posting to Autocat Before I reply more specifically, I disputed a statement that RDA is a major step into the future. I agree that AACR2 does not deal with many of these issues, but neither does RDA....
View ArticleClik here to view.
Re: [ACAT] New rule implementation
Posting to Autocat On 29/03/2012 22:12, Kevin M Randall wrote: <snip>James Weinheimer wrote: That is news to me. From everything I have seen, the data model is based on entities, and the entities...
View ArticleClik here to view.
Re: [RDA-L] “Work manifested” in new RDA examples
Posting to RDA-L On 05/06/2012 11:29, Heidrun Wiesenmüller wrote: <snip>We do lots of record exchange in Germany between various systems. In the exchange format, it’s common to have both the...
View ArticleClik here to view.
Re: [ACAT] NOW he dies!
Posting to Autocat On 05/07/2012 20:53, J. McRee Elrod wrote: <snip>Thank you for adding that death date. Practices to should be driven by a wish to help patrons, not save work.</snip>...
View ArticleClik here to view.
Re: [ACAT] Priorities
Posting to Autocat On 08/07/2012 18:40, J. McRee Elrod wrote: <snip>In the case of adding death dates for the “bibliographic undead,” it is best done by *one* cataloguer to the national...
View ArticleClik here to view.
Re: [ACAT] Advance Notice: Phase 1 of the PCCAHITG Phased Implentation of RDA...
Posting to Autocat On 17/07/2012 17:25, McDonald, Stephen wrote: <snip>The only thing that will happen in Phase I is that records which are _not_ RDA compatible and _cannot_ be made more RDA...
View ArticleClik here to view.
Re: [ACAT] Advance Notice: Phase 1 of the PCCAHITG Phased Implentation of RDA...
Posting to Autocat On 17/07/2012 23:13, J. McRee Elrod wrote: <snip>Stephen McDonald said: In fact, most of the 1xx changes will make things a lot _more_ consistent than they ever were before. It...
View ArticleClik here to view.
New interfaces (was: on cataloguers and IT people)
Posting to Autocat On 04/08/2012 01:11, MULLEN Allen wrote: <snip>Setting that issue (abbreviations) aside for the time being, I’d like to flesh out how I would hope libraries should be able to...
View ArticleClik here to view.
Re: [ACAT] “Stories” vs. “Fiction” (was: Mommy porn)
Posting to Autocat On 13/08/2012 14:30, Mary Mastraccio wrote: <snip>Although I am all in favor of URIs, your example does not address the issue being discussed. Most current genre lists assume...
View ArticleClik here to view.
RE: [RDA-L] JSC, ISBD, and ISSN: harmonization discussions
Posting to RDA-L On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 1:54 AM, Karen Coyle wrote: <snip>Ugh. No, it begins with people who have web sites realizing that if they want their site to be found (also known as SEO)...
View ArticleClik here to view.
Cataloging Matters No. 16: Catalogs, Consistency and the Future
Catalogs, Consistency and the Future http://archive.org/details/CatalogingMattersNo.16CatalogsConsistencyAndTheFuture TRANSCRIPT Hello everyone and welcome to Cataloging Matters, a series of podcasts...
View ArticleClik here to view.
Re: [ACAT] New Bibliographic Framework: Update with Eric Miller
Posting to Autocat On 11/10/2012 16:05, Brenndorfer, Thomas wrote: <snip>Part of the essential problem is that you keep saying that FRBR is about finding WEMI through authors, titles and subjects...
View Article
